Here's one problem i have with this,at the RNC convention last yr bloomberg was kissing up to bush all over the place at the convention last yr and then when the convention was over he lied in his press conference saying NYC received tons of cash during the convention but we didn't get a single dime,and now bloomberg wants to make a u-turn and he a former dem himself wants to kiss up to the dems to hold their convention here yeah ok mike.

http://www.dailykos.com/storyonly/2005/7/20/161124/242

Bloomberg is after all a liberal democrat from Boston.

The Dems were offered the convention in NY last year (and because of 9-11 should have taken it), but they wanted exclusive and Terry Goofy Grin McAuliffe told Bloomberg to shove it.

If I were the dems I would take the offer for 2008, especially as Hillary is going to get the nomination and it would make sense for it to be in her backyard. There is no better place.

It is too bad the dems would never have nominated Bloomberg-he is a great mayor and as he is self-made rich, he can't be bought, and he hasn't. He does things his own way.

I would take him over Czar Rudy or Ed the phony anyday.

I understand where you stand on this issue with bloomberg graham but i want to show you here at kos about what he said about rove's comments on 9-11 everyone thought bloomberg would go public and fully condemn what rove said he didn't.

http://www.dailykos.com/story/2005/7/1/142154/3548