Help - Search - Members - Calendar
Full Version: New CRS Study on War Spending: The Surging Costs
Common Ground Common Sense > Issues that Affect Our Lives > U.S. Military Issues
Snuffysmith
New CRS Study on War Spending

The Surging Costs of the Iraq War
By WINSLOW T. WHEELER

The Congressional Research Service has just sent to Congress its latest update of the costs of the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan, "The Cost of Iraq, Afghanistan, and Other Global War on Terror Operations Since 9/11," dated July 16, 2007.

Important elements of the new report include the following:

Assuming Congress' approval of President George W. Bush's request for war costs for the upcoming fiscal year 2008 (a request of $141.7 billion), total appropriations related to the wars would reach $758 billion, including $567 billion for Iraq, $157 billion for Afghanistan, $29 billion for other security operations in the US and elsewhere, and $5 billion which can be attributed to "unknown" due to the Defense Department's inability to track its own money. (See second to last paragraph in the report's "Summary.")

Counting all war appropriations to date, including those for not just DOD but also the State Department and the VA, costs per month have risen from about $12 billion in FY 2006 to about $14.4 billion in FY 2007. (See p. 3)

2007 costs total $173 billion. Of that amount, $135.2 billion is for Iraq, and $36.9 billion is for Afghanistan.

In addition to the extra costs of the "surge" of troops in Iraq, the increase in costs from 2006 to 2007 is explained by a dramatic increase in procurement spending to replace warn out equipment and to move acquisition costs for routine modernization (such as for V-22s and C-17s) from the regular annual budget to the separate budget for the war. (See p. 18-19)

Current plans anticipate a reduction of spending in 2008: down to a total of $147.5 billion, of which $116.3 billion would be for Iraq. However, that plan assumes that the "surge" of US troops would terminate abruptly on September 30, 2007. (See p. 6) It would appear logical to assess that a continuation of the surge would require funding above the 2007 total if the size of the US deployment in Iraq and the tempo of operations continue at their present rate for more than six months in FY 2008.

Cost per deployed troop has increased from $320,000 for each troop in 2003 to $390,000 for each in 2006. (See p. 24)

CRS, CBO, and GAO each continue to find major discrepancies in DOD's reporting on annual expenditures. (See p. 26) GAO's Comptroller General reported that the continuing inability of DOD to account for its own spending "make it difficult to reliably know what the war is costing, to determine how appropriated funds are being spent, and to use historical data to predict future trends." (See p. 28)

DOD may be "front loading" its budget requests for "reset" (repair and refurbishment of equipment and units) by requesting funds twice for both the Army and the Marine Corps for reset in 2007. (See p. 32)

While the Congressional Budget Office has made nominal estimates for the future costs of the wars (ranging from $393 billion to $840 billion [See p. 10]), the actual future costs of the wars is truly unknown, especially if one includes long term costs for the wars' veterans as paid out over decades by the VA. Beyond federal appropriations, there are also other costs, such as to the economy, that have been measured by other studies.

To receive a copy of this report, request same at winslowwheeler@msn.com

Winslow T. Wheeler is the Director of the Straus Military Reform Project of the Center for Defense Information and author of The Wastrels of Defense. Over 31 years, he worked for US Senators from both political parties and the Government Accountability Office on national security issues.
rla
The most cost effective remedy is Impeach Cheny and Bush II.
jeffmoskin
Using well-founded Harvard Business School reasoning, Bush has SAVED us money.

Before Bush, oil cost $22 to $28 a barrel. Lets call it $25.

After Bush, oil costs $75 a barrel.

Plus, with Saddam removed, only US dollars can be used to buy it.

The world uses 82 million barrels a day, of which we use 20. That leaves 62 million barrels X 365 = 22.6 billion barrels a year.

Multiply that by 50 (the added price due to Bush) yields a demand for 1131 billion dollars. The war cost about 500 billion, so Bush has brought us a profit of 631 billion dollars.

And he has printed at least that many dollars this year alone.

Perhaps THAT explains the DJIA hitting 14,000
grammydidi
QUOTE(jeffmoskin @ Jul 20 2007, 07:50 PM) *
Using well-founded Harvard Business School reasoning, Bush has SAVED us money.

Before Bush, oil cost $22 to $28 a barrel. Lets call it $25.

After Bush, oil costs $75 a barrel.

Plus, with Saddam removed, only US dollars can be used to buy it.

The world uses 82 million barrels a day, of which we use 20. That leaves 62 million barrels X 365 = 22.6 billion barrels a year.

Multiply that by 50 (the added price due to Bush) yields a demand for 1131 billion dollars. The war cost about 500 billion, so Bush has brought us a profit of 631 billion dollars.

And he has printed at least that many dollars this year alone.

Perhaps THAT explains the DJIA hitting 14,000


That's a little over $2K for every man, women & child (300 million) in the US times 5 yeasrs or $10K. And the war has cost each of us over $25K right now according to some of the stuff I've read. I'd say that's not very profitable.

But since we'll never see any of it in our bank accounts, I'm sure Big Oil appreciates the hell of it.
jeffmoskin
QUOTE(grammydidi @ Jul 20 2007, 06:35 PM) *
That's a little over $2K for every man, women & child (300 million) in the US times 5 yeasrs or $10K. And the war has cost each of us over $25K right now according to some of the stuff I've read. I'd say that's not very profitable.

But since we'll never see any of it in our bank accounts, I'm sure Big Oil appreciates the hell of it.

Every person who uses American dollars should appreciate it. There are 11 trillion dollars out there. What they used to buy is now made in China. If they cant be used to buy expensive oil, they will drop like the Peso did in Argentina.
flydangler
Pardon me all to hell if I missed it someplace, but methinks I'm just not seein' where this thread has much of anything really to do with "U.S. Military Issues". Seems to be more 'bout Bush bashin' and conjecture 'bout government spendin', both fine subjects y'all appear to be havin' lotsa fun with, and maybe a bit of pushin' for Winslow T. Wheeler's book, but not really directly 'bout "U.S. Military Issues" at all, eh?

Could someone please set me straight on this?
tomhye
QUOTE(flydangler @ Jul 21 2007, 02:26 PM) *
Pardon me all to hell if I missed it someplace, but methinks I'm just not seein' where this thread has much of anything really to do with "U.S. Military Issues". Seems to be more 'bout Bush bashin' and conjecture 'bout government spendin', both fine subjects y'all appear to be havin' lotsa fun with, and maybe a bit of pushin' for Winslow T. Wheeler's book, but not really directly 'bout "U.S. Military Issues" at all, eh?

Could someone please set me straight on this?


Well, it looks to me like it indicates even worse equipment problems next year and as long as the budget requests are done the same way, other than that I don't see it either.
rla
QUOTE(flydangler @ Jul 21 2007, 03:26 PM) *
Pardon me all to hell if I missed it someplace, but methinks I'm just not seein' where this thread has much of anything really to do with "U.S. Military Issues". Seems to be more 'bout Bush bashin' and conjecture 'bout government spendin', both fine subjects y'all appear to be havin' lotsa fun with, and maybe a bit of pushin' for Winslow T. Wheeler's book, but not really directly 'bout "U.S. Military Issues" at all, eh?

Could someone please set me straight on this?

But don't you think its cute?
This is a "lo-fi" version of our main content. To view the full version with more information, formatting and images, please click here.
Invision Power Board © 2001-2008 Invision Power Services, Inc.